This sounds good. I'll have to download pokerstars on the laptop again as I deleted it after some horrendous bad beats. 

Yeah I wouldn't enter unless I had gambled on the site like. I wonder how many people either do a one spin to become active and enter and how many people just enter without even playing on the site? Also if someone gets drawn and wins but hasn't followed to the rules do they redraw or is it just a wasted winner? 

Nice, just seems like a scummy way to get involved. I could technically enter a years worth of giveaways for one casino for 12p. Bit rank. 

So I've entered all the giveaways for this month barring casilando and dream Vegas (casilando won't unban me after my GAMSTOP ended) I deposited on casoola, CC,yako and slot planet. In total I believe about £200 in deposits and down around £50. Saw that you are doing a giveaway for dream Vegas that wasn't up about 3 days ago. I went on dream Vegas and I had 5p left over from something. If I just spin that 5p on book of dead can I then technically enter the giveaway for dream Vegas? Or is that not considered eligble for a entry. More than likely gonna deposit anyways as fancy a gamble but would like to know.  Thanks. 

Yeah I wouldn't enter unless I had gambled on the site like. I wonder how many people either do a one spin to become active and enter and how many people just enter without even playing on the site? Also if someone gets drawn and wins but hasn't followed to the rules do they redraw or is it just a wasted winner? 

THIS. All we want is transparency and I believe that it's the only thing we are owed by content creators, especially gambling related content. He needs calling out for it by people with influence, which Jimbo has done on twitter previously (different site) this post doesn't break any t&c so zero reason why anyone would remove the post. 

Agreed. If I'm doing a bigger/longer session I will not play sites that use the lower RTP. There are not many out there now that use the higher rtps. I believe 21 casino and leovegas are the only ones I've come across. Potentially rizk but I haven't checked all the providers as I don't play at rizk. I think that ukgc should ban sites doing this. Some people don't realise that a 2% decrease in RTP is absolutely astronomical in the long run. I think the worse part is the majority of players won't even know that providers offer multiple RTP versions of games. I think that there should be some kind of warning as if I didn't know and was given a warning I would not play.  Needs to be transparency for players. It's the exact same as double zero roulette. If you said you can play this game with 37 numbers and the houses edge is only 2.7% OR you can play this same game but with 38 numbers and the house edge is now 5.26%, do you think any sane responsible individual is picking the double zero roulette? I would hope not. 

Agreed. If I'm doing a bigger/longer session I will not play sites that use the lower RTP. There are not many out there now that use the higher rtps. I believe 21 casino and leovegas are the only ones I've come across. Potentially rizk but I haven't checked all the providers as I don't play at rizk. I think that ukgc should ban sites doing this. Some people don't realise that a 2% decrease in RTP is absolutely astronomical in the long run. I think the worse part is the majority of players won't even know that providers offer multiple RTP versions of games. I think that there should be some kind of warning as if I didn't know and was given a warning I would not play.  Needs to be transparency for players. It's the exact same as double zero roulette. If you said you can play this game with 37 numbers and the houses edge is only 2.7% OR you can play this same game but with 38 numbers and the house edge is now 5.26%, do you think any sane responsible individual is picking the double zero roulette? I would hope not. 

Wow nice. I love how the deposits didn't dramatically increase. Stay sensible mate. Have a good Christmas on the casinos. 

Yeah I hate that some casinos do this but what hurts more is not being able to withdraw an even amount. First world problems are hard. 

Have a good Christmas all.

I haven't looked at the terms but that sounds fucking horrendous. So with a £100 deposit you need to wager 40x to then get £100 cash? Or £100 bonus that you then need to wager 40x again? I've seen some sites that give you real cash in increments after % wagered with real money but to have to wager the entire thing should not be a bonus type at all. In future for sure scrutinise the terms and conditions because sometimes the terms are terrible. 

Nice idea but I think it's just gonna promote people to post to try and win money. Don't think giveaways are the best option. Not sure what a good solution is but I don't think giveaways arent going to do that much. 

Yeah 100% this. I understand the giveaways are what help drive revenue and the forum is never gonna make them money but would be good to have some more people, differing opinions on a more regular basis. 

Nice good luck. My only worry is the munhoz fight. Gonna be a really good fight but I actually think munhoz is a slight favourite. This card is actual fire despite nobody being a "known" name. Also I hate having odds like barcelos in a ACCA. Clearly a favourite but it's MMA who the fuck knows what's gonna happen.