I went through a full KYC with Rizk just near Christmas. Payslips provided, proof of casino winnings for December and bank statements. This resulted in a net loss limit of £400 per month which I thought was reasonable.

Roll forward and last week I had an email to say that my account had again been reviewed and the net loss limit had now been set at £130 and could I also answer the following questions about do I feel comfortable playing and so on.

I answered the questions, voluntarily submitted my outgoings each month and showed further proof that I earn well above £30k a year. I suggested that they put the £400 back in place. Their response:

Oddly enough my account says my max deposit level in a month is £400 but net loss £130 so how does that work?

Had a lot of issues with limits recently. I get why they do it, I even agree they do it but the goalposts just keep moving. I've already posted threads about WHG not even telling you that you have a limit.

I am toying with putting a 6 month self exclusion on the sites that I play. Not because it's getting too much for me or getting me into trouble but more because I can see further difficulties down the line, more random reviews when I have proved my financial status in relation to playing and less incentive to bother playing at all.

Take a look at the scene now. Every streamer seems to average £10 spins (boys excluded) or more. It isn't real in relation to your average Joe. I get bored watching Casino Grounds Streamer videos. I still like the Community ones. There's only Bandit keeping it real - and by that his explanation of money and his venture into his new channel. The lads here are keeping it real because you don't see massive amounts of content from them. That says to me they can't afford to put out massive amounts of content if they are using their own money. Even Jimbo said recently he'd got bored of playing.

I suppose when the fun stops, STOP 🤣